Navigating the Storm: The Philippines' Crucial Crossroads

March 19, 2025

About the author

 

The Philippines, an archipelagic nation in Southeast Asia, stands at a critical crossroads, facing a complex array of challenges that span political, economic, social, and geopolitical realms. Under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the country grapples with significant political instability, marked by mounting scrutiny over unfulfilled campaign promises, governance issues, and allegations of massive and widespread corruption. These concerns, coupled with socioeconomic challenges, have eroded public trust and deepened dissatisfaction, further complicating the nation's efforts to achieve political stability and economic prosperity.

 

On the international front, the Philippines contends with escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly in the South China Sea, alongside strained diplomatic relations, especially with China. The combination of internal governance challenges and external pressures creates a volatile environment, posing critical questions about the country's future. How will the Philippines navigate this turbulent period? What lies ahead for the Philippines? The answers lie in its ability to address these deep-rooted issues with a focus on good governance, economic prosperity, social cohesion, and safeguarding national interests, all while striving to preserve its standing in the community of nations. The path forward is uncertain, but the country's ability to confront these challenges will shape its political trajectory and global standing in the years to come.

 

2025 National Budget Scandal

Over the past few weeks, the Philippines has been engulfed by three major political crises that have further compounded the nation's political challenges. First is the controversy surrounding the alleged inclusion of blank items in the Bicameral Conference Committee (Bicam) Report, linked to the ongoing scandal surrounding the General Appropriations Act (GAA) 2025, also known as the 2025 National Budget, which has ignited public outrage and questions about legislative trustworthiness, integrity, and credibility.

 

In a significant legal challenge, several political figures have petitioned the Supreme Court (SC) to examine the constitutionality and integrity of the 2025 GAA. Their primary concern revolves around the claim that the Bicam report linked to the 2025 GAA contains 28 blank line items spread over 13 pages, which they argue violates constitutional provisions requiring transparency and specificity in budget legislation. In response to this petition, the SC has directed both the executive and legislative branches to file comments on the matter within a non-extendable period of 10 days after receiving the notice.

 

Recently, the SC announced that oral arguments for the case are scheduled on April 1, 2025, and a preliminary conference in Manila for February 28, 2025. This development signals that the Court is reviewing the allegations and will soon determine the constitutionality of the 2025 GAA.

 

This situation highlights the critical importance of ensuring that the national budget is sound and adheres to constitutional guidelines to maintain credibility and integrity. As the Philippines faces this constitutional challenge over its 2025 national budget, the outcome will have significant implications for both government operations and fiscal policy. The resolution of this case will likely shape future approaches to budget formulation and transparency, marking a pivotal moment in the nation's governance.

 

Impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte

In the unfolding "game of thrones" in the country's political landscape, on February 5, the House of Representatives impeached Vice President (VP) Sara Duterte, daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, a move that will undoubtedly be etched into the annals of Philippine political history. The impeachment, supported by 215 of 306 lawmakers, surpassed the one-third threshold required to proceed.

 

Congressman Sandro Marcos, the son of the incumbent president, was the first to sign the impeachment complaint. To cap it all off, the family tag team was completed with the final signature of House Speaker Martin Romualdez, President Marcos Jr.'s cousin. This sequence of events vividly demonstrates the Marcos-Romualdez political alliance's central role in orchestrating this outcome.

 

To secure a conviction and removal from office, a two-thirds majority (16 out of 24 senators) is necessary. If convicted, Duterte would face the severe consequence of being permanently barred from holding any public office, thereby truncating any prospects for a political comeback. The impeachment trial of VP Duterte is said to proceed in the Senate once Congress reconvenes on June 2, 2025, following the May midterm elections. However, mounting pressure from certain political factions and influential segments of the Philippine political sphere is calling on President Marcos Jr. to convene a special session, aiming to expedite the impeachment process. In addition, some political figures have filed a petition with the SC, arguing that the 1987 Constitution mandates an immediate commencement of the trial. This petition underscores their belief that such a swift resolution is necessary to determine whether Duterte will remain in office or face removal.

 

However, supporters and VP Duterte herself recently filed a petition with the SC seeking to invalidate her impeachment and prevent a Senate trial that could potentially lead to her removal from office. In her petition, Duterte's legal team argues that the impeachment process was procedurally flawed and constitutionally invalid. They contend that the complaint was expedited without proper scrutiny, potentially as a strategy to eliminate Duterte as a contender in the 2028 presidential elections. By seeking judicial intervention, the VP and her supporters are not only challenging the grounds for impeachment but also questioning the broader political implications of such a legal procedure.

 

In this regard, the SC's decision on these petitions filed by both sides is pivotal, as it will not only decide whether the impeachment trial in the Senate will proceed but also address critical constitutional questions that could halt the process entirely. This case brings to the forefront the deepening political tensions in the Philippines, highlighting the delicate balance of power between the country's branches of government, which may lead to a "constitutional crisis," "inter-institutional conflict," or "separation of powers dispute" between Congress and the SC.

 

Indeed, this situation raises fundamental concerns about the independence of the legislative and judicial branches, which, under the Constitution, are theoretically co-equal, independent, and separate from one another. The outcome of this legal challenge has the potential to set significant precedents on the extent to which the judiciary can intervene in the political process, thereby shaping the future dynamics of governance in the Philippines. Note that while the judiciary has the authority to review legal matters, it traditionally refrains from intervening in political processes like impeachment, which are meant to be handled by the legislature.

 

In retrospect, the unfolding impeachment proceedings against VP Duterte underscore deep-seated tensions within the Philippine political landscape, raising critical questions about the interpretation and application of constitutional principles. This case is not merely a legal battle; it serves as a litmus test for the Philippine judiciary's role in mediating conflicts between the legislative and executive branches. As the SC deliberates on whether to halt or allow the impeachment trial, its ruling could set landmark precedents on the boundaries of judicial review and the extent to which political actors can contest impeachment processes on constitutional grounds.

 

Beyond its legal implications, this political crisis is symptomatic of the broader turmoil gripping the country's political terrain and governance. It reflects an increasingly fragile political climate, where factional disputes and partisan maneuvering threaten institutional stability. At the heart of this conflict is the escalating Romualdez-Marcos-Duterte feud, which has transformed from an electoral alliance into an open struggle for power. What was once the "UniTeam" coalition, a symbol of political unity in the May 2022 elections, has now unraveled into a contentious battle marked by mutual accusations, strategic positioning, an intensifying "game of thrones," and clash of political ambitions.

 

The fallout from this dispute extends beyond the immediate fate of VP Duterte. This impeachment saga is not only a legal contest but also a defining moment in the country's political evolution, one that could either reinforce or destabilize democratic institutions. The outcome of this power struggle will have lasting repercussions, influencing the balance of power and setting the trajectory for the nation's political future.

 

Midterm Elections Amidst Political Unrest

Moreover, the upcoming May 2025 mid-term elections cast a long shadow over the Philippines' political landscape, introducing an added layer of uncertainty that amplifies the existing volatility. With 317 congressional seats and numerous local positions at stake, the elections will be pivotal in shaping the country's immediate political future. However, it is the 12 Senate seats that are likely to attract the most attention, given their critical role in the impeachment against VP Duterte. These elections will not only determine the composition of Congress but will also have far-reaching implications for the balance of power between the Marcos and Duterte political factions.

 

The potential outcomes of the May 2025 elections could fundamentally alter the political dynamics, either paving the way for the strengthening and consolidation of power by the Marcos-Romualdez political alliance or shifting the balance in favor of the Duterte faction. Such shifts would have significant ramifications for the 2028 Presidential elections, as the results may impact the political fortunes of both factions and influence who holds the reins of power in the years to come. As such, the May 2025 elections are more than just a contest for legislative and local offices. They are a decisive moment in the ongoing political struggle between and among powerful dynastic forces, each vying for greater influence and control over the future trajectory of the nation.

 

Moreover, as campaign periods commence, they do so against a backdrop of profound political instability and the overwhelming influence of political dynasties. The continued prominence of these dynasties, where power is monopolized by a select few families, presents a significant barrier to genuine democratic representation and effective governance, and limits opportunities for diverse voices and new leadership, but also perpetuates a patronage political system and personality-based politics that favor entrenched interests and further breeds backward politics over genuine political representation.

 

At the core of this issue is the question of whether the political climate will evolve into one that fosters meaningful reform, or whether it will continue to support a system steeped in clientele-patronage politics and personality-driven campaigns. The Philippines has long struggled with a political system where electoral success often hinges more on negative campaigning, political mudslinging, familial ties, popularity, and patronage networks than on substantive political platforms and policy discussions or long-term development strategies. This dynamic has stifled progress, ensuring that political institutions remain trapped in a cycle of self-interest and short-term gains rather than addressing the systemic issues that hinder the country's development and progress.

 

As the May 2025 elections approach, the critical challenge for the Filipino electorate is whether they can break free from these entrenched patterns. Will the elections bring forth leaders who are committed to addressing the root causes of massive corruption, inequality, and social injustice? Or will they merely reinforce the status quo, ensuring that the same political families and political interests dominate, leaving little room for genuine political and policy reforms? This question is not only about the outcome of the elections but about the future trajectory of Philippine democracy. The answers will have profound implications, potentially determining whether the country can move beyond its historical political entanglements and pave the way for a more just and inclusive society.

 

Conclusion

Indeed, the future of the Philippines hinges on its ability to confront and address the critical challenges that define its current political terrain. The path ahead is fraught with significant obstacles and challenges. However, it is also lined with potential opportunities for reform, contingent upon the collective will of the Filipino people on how they respond to this defining moment in their nation's history, determining whether the country can emerge stronger, with renewed national pride and unity, or continue along a path of instability. Undoubtedly, the actions taken in this defining moment will significantly impact the nation's political trajectory and its future for generations. The choices made today, whether in the realms of governance, economics, or international relations, will determine the nation's trajectory and whether it can overcome its tribulations to secure a more prosperous, stable, and bright future for its citizens.

 

 

This article is from the February issue of TI Observer (TIO), which explores Asia in micro and macro scale during this unprecedented period of uncertainty in decades, highlighting the shifting economic ambitions, security concerns, and diplomatic strategies of Asian countries in the process of redefining their positions within an increasingly multipolar world. If you are interested in knowing more about the February issue, please click here:

http://en.taiheinstitute.org/UpLoadFile/files/2025/2/27/162841654bb4b4485-6.pdf

 

——————————————

ON TIMES WE FOCUS.

Should you have any questions, please contact us at public@taiheglobal.org